Nimble Legacy | Organisational Development & Strategy

The cost and impact of Greenwashing

Analysis – Understanding Greenwashing, its Cost and Risk to Business

Table of Contents

How to Protect Your Brand and Communicate Authentic Sustainability | Published by Nimble Legacy Consulting. Date: April 2025

Introduction to Avoiding Greenwashing Guidance

Greenwashing is the act of presenting a false impression or a misleading information about how a company’s products are environmentally friendly. It has become a critical reputational and financial risk for businesses. In the age of conscious consumerism, ESG-focused investment, and digital transparency, businesses must tread carefully when promoting sustainability.

As stakeholder awareness and regulatory scrutiny increase, companies that misrepresent their environmental performance or exaggerate progress risk backlash from customers, investors, regulators, and the public. Greenwashing not only undermines legitimate sustainability efforts but also damages industry-wide credibility, setting back progress toward global climate goals.

This guide presents an overview of key greenwashing scandals, their impact on businesses, recovery strategies, and evidence-based principles for avoiding greenwashing. It aims to equip decision-makers, marketers, sustainability professionals, and compliance teams with a deeper understanding of the risks and practical solutions to ensure authenticity in green marketing.

Professional Insight Analysis: The Risks and Realities of Greenwashing

Understanding Greenwashing in Modern Marketing

Greenwashing is a deceptive practice where businesses use marketing or PR strategies to appear more environmentally responsible than they truly are. This can involve exaggerating sustainability claims, omitting critical information, or using vague terminology that is intended to mislead consumers. In an era where environmental and social governance (ESG) considerations are becoming central to both consumer choices and investor decisions, greenwashing poses a significant reputational, regulatory, and operational risk.

The rise of conscious consumerism, where individuals actively aware of brand’s ethical, sustainable characteristics, a powerful incentive for companies to highlight green credentials has grown. It is not all greenwashing cases that are intentional however, without genuine actions to back up any green credential claims, businesses risk eroding the very trust they aim to build. Consumers today expect companies to go beyond symbolic gestures. They want brands to demonstrate measurable, verified progress.

The growth of digital platforms has also enabled watchdog groups, whistleblowers, and consumers themselves to investigate and call out discrepancies in sustainability claims in real time. A single misleading ad or green claim without an evidence can go viral within hours, resulting in significant brand damage.

Impact on Consumer Trust

Consumer trust is built on perceived honesty and transparency. Once a company is exposed for greenwashing, the damage can be long-lasting:

  1. Skepticism does not just affect the guilty brand but it impacts a wider trust on sustainability claims in general, undermining the entire green movement.
  2. Various research shows that once trust is broken, regaining it requires significantly more effort than maintaining it in the first place.
  3. Greenwashing incidents have been shown to result in reduced customer lifetime value, decreased brand loyalty, and lower Net Promoter Scores (NPS).
  4. A 2022 Deloitte study indicated that 48% of consumers would stop buying from a company they believe is greenwashing. You cannot blame the customer in this case.

Wider Risks for Businesses

Regulatory Risk

  1. Global regulations are getting tighter. In the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) introduced the Green Claims Code, which sets strict criteria for environmental messaging.
  2. In the EU, proposed legislation such as the Green Claims Directive mandates third-party verification of any green claims.
  3. The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is updating its Green Guides to crack down on misleading environmental advertising.

Non-compliance can lead to fines, legal battles, forced product withdrawals, and public corrections, all of which can be costly and damaging. Aside from the legal repercussions, unsubstantiated green claims on some products can cause significant health risk with lives endangered.  Lawsuits and penalties can also create operational distractions, reduce investor confidence, and lead to long-term brand devaluation.

Investment and Financial Risk

  1. ESG-focused investors conduct increasingly rigorous due diligence. 

  2. If greenwashing is detected, businesses can lose access to ESG funds, experience stock price drops, or be excluded from sustainability indices.

  3. Investors are demanding more standardised ESG disclosures and independently audited environmental performance data. Any greenwashig claims are likely to be exposed and back-fire.

Operational Risk

  1. Relying on deceptive messaging can create misalignment between brand promise and operational reality.

  2. This can lead to internal confusion and conflicts between teams, inefficiency, and wasted resources, as departments may pursue superficial sustainability efforts. 

  3. Inconsistent practices may also expose businesses to supply chain risks and disrupt operational continuity.

Talent and Employer Branding Risk

  1. Talented professionals, particularly Millennials and Gen Z, seek purpose-driven companies. 

  2. If a company is perceived as disingenuous, it can struggle to attract or retain value-driven employees, impacting innovation and morale badly.

  3. Internal dissatisfaction with corporate ethics may reduce productivity and increase staff turnover.

Best Practice: How Businesses Can Avoid Greenwashing

Avoiding greenwashing isn’t just about compliance—it’s a strategic advantage. The warning here it to avoid creating a burden for your team. The list below will show you how to genuinely embed sustainability into your busines processes and avoid reputational missteps but you need to be wise to adopt them in stages:

Adopt Clear and Verifiable Claims

  • Ensure all sustainability claims are clear, quantifiable, time-bound, and evidence-based.

  • For example: Replace “We’re reducing our carbon footprint” with “We’ve reduced our Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 27% since 2021.”

  • Provide accessible documentation and context for sustainability claims, ideally on your website.

Ensure Internal Alignment

  • Marketing teams should work hand-in-hand with ESG, legal, and operational departments to ensure claims reflect the business’s actual performance. This is where sustaianbility training for your organisation will play its part.

  • Implement internal sign-off protocols for sustainability messaging.

  • Conduct cross-functional reviews to identify gaps between branding and operational reality.

Use Recognised Standards and Certifications

  • Align with international frameworks such as:

    1. ISO 14001 for environmental management – Environmental management system is a simple tool that can help you get all staff to work together in understanding the impact your organisation is making on the environment.

    2. GHG Protocol for emissions accounting

    3. CDP or SASB for sustainability disclosures

  • Independent third-party validation increases credibility and improves stakeholder confidence.

Invest in Real Sustainability Improvements

  • Go beyond cosmetic changes: integrate circular economy principles, improve supply chain transparency, and implement a formal Environmental Management System (EMS).

  • Track progress using tools like carbon calculators, life cycle assessments, and sustainability performance software. you can also use a simple excel document – whatever works best for your team.

  • Ensure executive leadership is involved and accountable for ESG outcomes.

Communicate Honestly and Progressively

  • Be transparent about where the company is on its sustainability journey. Share the roadmap, milestones, and challenges.

  • Avoid presenting sustainability as a completed activity becasue it will always need improvement as far as the environment and regulations keeps changing. As a consumers I know that honest progress over perfect messaging is more valuable.

  • Publicly report both successes and areas needing improvement.

Train and Empower Staff

  • Provide sustainability literacy training across departments.

  • Empower employees to speak confidently and accurately about the business’s environmental efforts, creating a culture of openness and truthfulness about your products, services and business operations.

  • Encourage cross-departmental ESG working groups to facilitate ongoing learning and alignment opportunities.

Lessons from Real-World Scandals and Case Studies of Greenwashing Scandals

Volkswagen – "Dieselgate" (2015)

Claim: Volkswagen advertised its diesel vehicles as low-emission and eco-friendly.

Reality: The cars were equipped with software that manipulated emissions tests. Real-world NOx emissions were up to 40 times the legal limit.

Consequences:

  • Over $30 billion in fines, legal costs, and vehicle buybacks.

  • Massive reputation damage and executive resignations.

  • Criminal charges and lawsuits globally.

Recovery Strategy:

  • Shifted investment focus to electric vehicles (EVs), pledging €35 billion.

  • Rebranded under the “Way to Zero” campaign targeting carbon neutrality by 2050.

Reference: Ewing, J. (2017). Volkswagen Scandal Reaches All the Way to the Top, Lawsuits Say. The New York Times.

Claim: Promoted clothing lines as sustainable, using eco-friendly materials.

Reality: Investigations revealed vague and unverifiable claims. Most products offered no substantial sustainability advantage over standard items.

Consequences:

  • Consumer backlash and regulatory scrutiny across Europe.

  • Reputational damage among eco-conscious shoppers.

Recovery Strategy:

  • Committed to supply chain transparency and clearer labelling.

  • Published environmental scores at product level (under scrutiny).

  • Partnered with sustainability platforms like Global Fashion Agenda.

Reference: Norwegian Consumer Authority (2021). Investigation into misleading environmental claims in fashion retail.

Claim: Rebranded as environmentally progressive, committed to transitioning beyond fossil fuels.

Reality: Only a small portion of investments went into renewables. The company continued extensive oil and gas operations.

Consequences:

  • Widespread accusations of greenwashing.

  • Further reputational harm following the Deepwater Horizon disaster (2010).

Recovery Strategy:

  • Announced a net-zero ambition by 2050.

  • Expanded investments in renewables, hydrogen, and EV infrastructure.

Reference: Cho, R.L. (2015). BP and the Deepwater Horizon Disaster of 2010. Harvard Business School Case.

Claim: Advertised itself as Europe’s greenest airline.

Reality: Claims were found misleading due to lack of context and substantiation.

Consequences:

  • Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned the ads.

  • Faced public and media criticism.

Recovery Strategy:

  • Published detailed emissions data.

  • Released a Sustainability Report focused on fleet efficiency and carbon offsetting.

Reference: ASA Ruling on Ryanair DAC (2020). Advertising Standards Authority.

Claim: Marketed products as “made with 100% renewable electricity.” Reality: The claim applied only to manufacturing, misleading consumers into thinking the entire lifecycle was renewable-powered. Consequences:
  • Faced a consumer lawsuit for deceptive marketing.
  • Criticised by sustainability watchdog groups.
Recovery Strategy:
  • Clarified environmental messaging.
  • Enhanced sustainability disclosures and emissions tracking.
Reference: Earth Island Institute v. P&G (2022). Environmental marketing lawsuit documents.

Guidance on Avoiding Greenwashing

I believe that marketing teams do not outrightly set out to make greenwashing claims but out of thier enthusiasm to promote thier company product, excitement cannot be allowed to overshadow facts. This is why I recommend the following steps to avoid greenwashing:

Use Specific, Verifiable Claims

  • Avoid vague terms like “eco-friendly” or “green” unless you clearly define what they mean. Unless you clearly specify, in leyman’s terms, what you mean by them, your claim may be misinterpreted by the end user.

  • Support claims with measurable data (for example – “78% reduction in Scope 1 emissions since 2020”).

  • Back all claims with credible sources, data sheets, or certification links, there is no need to go overboard but the bottom line here is to create openness about the credibility of your claim.

Be Transparent About Limitations

  • Consumers appreciate honesty and by acknowledging areas where improvements are still needed, you will draw them closer to your brand in a way that followers interact with their favourite organisations.

  • Consumers appreciate honesty and transparency over perfection.

  • Demonstrate continuous improvement through updates and ESG roadmaps. Your continuous communication is part of your branding – get it right and it will pay off.

Align Marketing with Operations

  • Ensure all green claims are backed by real efforts in supply chain, product design, or processes.

  • It is essential to develop internal collaboration between your sustaianability/ESG, compliance, and marketing teams. this  

  • Conduct regular audits to ensure alignment across messaging and practice. This will requires a process of it’s own to make sure it is not a one off event.  You might want to assign this to your compliance team or hire a sustainability consulting service such as Nimble Legacy.

Adopt Recognised Standards

  • Global standards like ISO 14001, GHG Protocol, or B Corp Certification offer certified frameworks that you can rely on for a guaranteed outcome.

  • Use an independent verification and submit to transparency platforms such as EcoVadis.

Regular ESG Audits and Reporting

  • Implement third-party ESG audits will help to catch any signs of greenwashing early even when it is not intentional.

  • Publish annual sustainability reports with performance metrics. Consider integrated reporting frameworks like GRI, TCFD, or IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. There are various reporting frameworks currently but you will need to identify which framework is most acknowledged in your sector.

Train Staff and Empower Advocates

  • Deliver internal training on green claims and ESG principles. I will add that this training should start with managers and company leaders as they are best placed to communicate the importance of this guidance to all their team members.

  • Enable staff to confidently communicate accurate sustainability messages. The training mentioned is one of the enabling tools but ensures that they have the freedom to question the company’s claims too.

  • Encourage sustainability ambassadors and champions across departments. Finding passionate hands to lead the awareness of greenwashing might offer any organisation a quick start in avoiding making false green claims. It is however necessary that some organisation may need to look to employ sustainability officers or consultants to ensure a continuity of all compliance efforts.

Conclusion

References

The following references reflect sources from our online research:

  • Ewing, J. (2017). Volkswagen Scandal Reaches All the Way to the Top, Lawsuits Say. The New York Times.

  • Norwegian Consumer Authority (2021). Investigation into misleading environmental claims in fashion retail.

  • Cho, R.L. (2015). BP and the Deepwater Horizon Disaster of 2010. Harvard Business School Case.

  • ASA Ruling on Ryanair DAC (2020). Advertising Standards Authority.

  • Earth Island Institute v. P&G (2022). Environmental marketing lawsuit documents.

  • Deloitte Global Consumer Survey (2022). Sustainability and Trust in the Age of Greenwashing.

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Sustainability Reporting Standards.

  • CDP. Corporate Environmental Disclosure Platform.


Prepared by Nimble Legacy Consulting | For enquiries or additional copies, please contact: info@nimblelegacy.co.uk


Compiled by Nimble Legacy Consulting | Sources include The New York Times, Harvard Business Review, ASA, Norwegian Consumer Authority, Earth Island Institute legal documents, Deloitte Global Consumer Survey (2022), GRI, and CDP


Discover more from Nimble Legacy | Organisational Development & Strategy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Related Posts

Empathy at Work - Developing a culture of Caring

Have workplaces lost the value of caring for employees?

How well does your organisation care about its workforce? In any job, people go through ups and downs in life. Some of those things never get spoken about at work, but they still affect how well someone can do their job. But when someone knows their workplace is a safe and caring space, they are more likely to give it their all – helping the organisations to grow and making CARING a win-win solution for any organisation.

Read More »

What should the UK government and others do to strengthen and enable the move towards Net Zero | Circular economy

Governments worldwide are increasingly recognising the importance of promoting sustainability and resource efficiency to address environmental and economic challenges, from climate change to resource depletion. Here are some key initiatives:

Read More »

Discover more from Nimble Legacy | Organisational Development & Strategy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading